<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Freak Parade - Latest Comments in Rule Based Access Control using an Expression Evaluator</title><link>http://thefreakparade.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thefreakparade.disqus.com/rule_based_access_control_using_an_expression_evaluator/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:03:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rule Based Access Control using an Expression Evaluator</title><link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/09/rule-based-access-control-using-an-expression-evaluator/#comment-33215289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope, I think you gotta smoke more hookah.  It helps with the programming mind.  Let's it mellow out and study the problem at a subconcious level.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrhookah</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rule Based Access Control using an Expression Evaluator</title><link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/09/rule-based-access-control-using-an-expression-evaluator/#comment-4383363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;br&gt;This is really a nice concept and we are currently using the similar approach with Zermatt Claims based Identity framework. &lt;br&gt;However; I see some some articles on .Net which says XACML is the best way of implementing Authorization; I don't have much experience in XACML; but could you provide some thoughts on this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Ashwani&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ashwani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>